BenL
11-27-2006, 12:38 PM
I just got done teaching a class at our Episcopal Church about how the Anglican Communion will handle the controversy over the consecration of Gene Robinson as bishop of NH, and the Anglican Church of Canada's handling of rites for same-sex unions. We didn't talk a lot about the rightness or wrongness of homosexuality but more about the process by which the Communion will reconcile or split apart.
At the core of the debate was the question: Who has the authority to say that one person is right and another is wrong? Another question: Does one side have the right to demonize the other when advancing its own point of view? A related question: Does one side always have to be sacrificed in the name of orthodoxy, or can people who frame their faith differently live side by side?
The core of authority in Anglican churches rests in Scripture, but reason and tradition are invoked in the interpretation of Scripture. Evangelicals in Anglicanism (most are not Fundamentalists) look first to the Bible for answers to problems of faith. More progressive Anglicans (labels are dangerous, so be careful how you read them!) tend to see Scripture in a historical context and claim that it must be interpreted in light of current understandings. Anglican Evangelicals tend to see their progressive sisters and brothers as relativist and revisionist. Liberals tend to see conservatives as inflexible and behind the times.
Besides the theological arguments are the geopolitical ramifications. While there are plenty of Evangelicals in the United States and the United Kingdom, the church in the Third World is overwhelmingly conservative and evangelical. The division over homosexuality has been painted by some as a North/South divide. Like all generalities, this has flaws and inconsistencies. The church in South Africa, for instance, backs same-sex unions.
Despite the energy invested in this question, there are still people who are hungry and poor and marginalized both here in the US and in the Third World. There are still people who need to hear about God's love for them. I wonder sometimes if it displeases God when we get all tied in knots over institutional questions like these. Besides that, it still hurts to have someone who claims to be your brother or sister label you as sinful. Can't we work together to feed the hungry and comfort the broken -- and leave the judging to God?
If you made it this far, thanks for reading.
BenL
At the core of the debate was the question: Who has the authority to say that one person is right and another is wrong? Another question: Does one side have the right to demonize the other when advancing its own point of view? A related question: Does one side always have to be sacrificed in the name of orthodoxy, or can people who frame their faith differently live side by side?
The core of authority in Anglican churches rests in Scripture, but reason and tradition are invoked in the interpretation of Scripture. Evangelicals in Anglicanism (most are not Fundamentalists) look first to the Bible for answers to problems of faith. More progressive Anglicans (labels are dangerous, so be careful how you read them!) tend to see Scripture in a historical context and claim that it must be interpreted in light of current understandings. Anglican Evangelicals tend to see their progressive sisters and brothers as relativist and revisionist. Liberals tend to see conservatives as inflexible and behind the times.
Besides the theological arguments are the geopolitical ramifications. While there are plenty of Evangelicals in the United States and the United Kingdom, the church in the Third World is overwhelmingly conservative and evangelical. The division over homosexuality has been painted by some as a North/South divide. Like all generalities, this has flaws and inconsistencies. The church in South Africa, for instance, backs same-sex unions.
Despite the energy invested in this question, there are still people who are hungry and poor and marginalized both here in the US and in the Third World. There are still people who need to hear about God's love for them. I wonder sometimes if it displeases God when we get all tied in knots over institutional questions like these. Besides that, it still hurts to have someone who claims to be your brother or sister label you as sinful. Can't we work together to feed the hungry and comfort the broken -- and leave the judging to God?
If you made it this far, thanks for reading.
BenL