novaseeker
12-19-2006, 04:45 PM
In reading revtj's response in the Episcopal thread, I was struck by something and wanted to respond without cluttering up that thread.
As I have been discussing these subjects on other blogs I have been amazed at christians who see the crucifixion as far more significant than the resurrection. Huh? One person replied to me Jesus' resurrection would have no meaning without his crucifixion.
It is hard for me to understand but it seems like a choice to ground their theological perspective in violence and death rather than in hope and new life. And the consequences seem to be that those obsessed with the crucifixion also have a shopping list of people they hate and people they reject. Sends a shiver up my spine!
Well … I think it’s a rather complicated thing. As someone raised in the Catholic Church but who spent the last several years (before I left the church a few years ago) as an Eastern Orthodox Christian, I see it as an East/West issue.
It’s true that for a long time the idea of “substitutionary atonement” of one stripe or another held sway among much of Western Christianity. This is, I think, because of the influence of St. Augustine’s ideas on the Western church. As I understand it, Augustine was one of a handful of early church “fathers” who were from the Western church, and his influence in Western theology, including resurrection theology, has been significant until recent times. Particularly among more fundamentalist or conservative evangelical Christians, the idea of Christ’s redemptive suffering, in the gory details of it, as God’s suffering to atone for humanity’s sinfulness, seems to be a powerful image, and in fact for many Roman Catholics as well (hence the centrality of the Crucifix, the sorrowful mysteries of the Rosary, Mel Gibson’s film, etc.). This theology *can* emphasize the crucifixion, because it is the act of atonement itself, the suffering and death itself, that “justifies” humanity in the eyes of God – and hence it can be viewed by adherents of this theology as the central act of salvation, while Easter is a token of eternal life to come for those who unite themselves to Christ’s suffering and redemptive death. Now, I’m making it sound more gruesome than it is for most people, but it still *can* be a very crucifixion-focused theology. I've probably overstated the case here, and I expect that others will have more nuances as to how I've characterized things relating to this ... it's been a while for me since I've actually read much Western theology.
Based on my experience with Eastern Orthodox theology, my understanding is that the Eastern churches generally do not view the crucifixion in the light of an atonement theology at all (Augustine’s views did not take hold in the Eastern churches to any substantial degree), but rather in the light of their own view of Christology – such that, while they would agree that the resurrection would have no meaning without the crucifixion, the reason isn’t due to the atonement made possible by Christ’s redemptive suffering and death, but rather the idea that the resurrection provided the pivotal encounter between death and the deathless man (or, rather, the one man who could not be made subject to death, because of his immortal divine nature, per Orthodox Christology), thereby removing the power of death from those who are made like Christ through the grace of baptism, eucharist, transformative living, prayer, grace, etc. The idea isn’t that Christ “got us off the hook”, but rather that Christ transformed the act of death itself, and removed the permanence of its power from those who live “in” him, such that those who *do* live “in Christ” will experience death as Christ did – namely in a non-permanent way. So this kind of theology still sees the crucifixion as critical (for without Christ’s encounter with death, death could not have been vanquished), but doesn’t get into the gory details of it (the idea isn’t focused on redemptive suffering to the same degree, or the idea of encouraging people to feel guilty for Christ’s sacrifice), and focuses much more intently on the resurrection as the sign of the new life.
As the Easter hymn of the Orthodox Church says, in a way of summing up the Eastern approach to the crucifixion and resurrection:
“Christ is risen from the dead,
Trampling down death by death,
And on those in the tombs
Bestowing life.”
As I have been discussing these subjects on other blogs I have been amazed at christians who see the crucifixion as far more significant than the resurrection. Huh? One person replied to me Jesus' resurrection would have no meaning without his crucifixion.
It is hard for me to understand but it seems like a choice to ground their theological perspective in violence and death rather than in hope and new life. And the consequences seem to be that those obsessed with the crucifixion also have a shopping list of people they hate and people they reject. Sends a shiver up my spine!
Well … I think it’s a rather complicated thing. As someone raised in the Catholic Church but who spent the last several years (before I left the church a few years ago) as an Eastern Orthodox Christian, I see it as an East/West issue.
It’s true that for a long time the idea of “substitutionary atonement” of one stripe or another held sway among much of Western Christianity. This is, I think, because of the influence of St. Augustine’s ideas on the Western church. As I understand it, Augustine was one of a handful of early church “fathers” who were from the Western church, and his influence in Western theology, including resurrection theology, has been significant until recent times. Particularly among more fundamentalist or conservative evangelical Christians, the idea of Christ’s redemptive suffering, in the gory details of it, as God’s suffering to atone for humanity’s sinfulness, seems to be a powerful image, and in fact for many Roman Catholics as well (hence the centrality of the Crucifix, the sorrowful mysteries of the Rosary, Mel Gibson’s film, etc.). This theology *can* emphasize the crucifixion, because it is the act of atonement itself, the suffering and death itself, that “justifies” humanity in the eyes of God – and hence it can be viewed by adherents of this theology as the central act of salvation, while Easter is a token of eternal life to come for those who unite themselves to Christ’s suffering and redemptive death. Now, I’m making it sound more gruesome than it is for most people, but it still *can* be a very crucifixion-focused theology. I've probably overstated the case here, and I expect that others will have more nuances as to how I've characterized things relating to this ... it's been a while for me since I've actually read much Western theology.
Based on my experience with Eastern Orthodox theology, my understanding is that the Eastern churches generally do not view the crucifixion in the light of an atonement theology at all (Augustine’s views did not take hold in the Eastern churches to any substantial degree), but rather in the light of their own view of Christology – such that, while they would agree that the resurrection would have no meaning without the crucifixion, the reason isn’t due to the atonement made possible by Christ’s redemptive suffering and death, but rather the idea that the resurrection provided the pivotal encounter between death and the deathless man (or, rather, the one man who could not be made subject to death, because of his immortal divine nature, per Orthodox Christology), thereby removing the power of death from those who are made like Christ through the grace of baptism, eucharist, transformative living, prayer, grace, etc. The idea isn’t that Christ “got us off the hook”, but rather that Christ transformed the act of death itself, and removed the permanence of its power from those who live “in” him, such that those who *do* live “in Christ” will experience death as Christ did – namely in a non-permanent way. So this kind of theology still sees the crucifixion as critical (for without Christ’s encounter with death, death could not have been vanquished), but doesn’t get into the gory details of it (the idea isn’t focused on redemptive suffering to the same degree, or the idea of encouraging people to feel guilty for Christ’s sacrifice), and focuses much more intently on the resurrection as the sign of the new life.
As the Easter hymn of the Orthodox Church says, in a way of summing up the Eastern approach to the crucifixion and resurrection:
“Christ is risen from the dead,
Trampling down death by death,
And on those in the tombs
Bestowing life.”