PDA

View Full Version : Focus on the Family protests free speech right


kara speltz
02-19-2007, 01:09 PM
I found this article when I was Googling and thought it was interesting.
I think the highlighted sentence is pretty funny, given we all know that what FOF really wants is for these corporations to join their war against LGBTs.

Kara



Focus on the Family Protests Free Speech Rights of Billboard Owners
Prior to the recent Love Won Out conference in Phoenix, Focus on the Family tried to purchase space on billboards owned by media communications company Clear Channel. The billboards were to bear the organization’s familiar drumbeat “I questioned homosexuality: Change is Possible, Discover How.” Clear Channel declined.

Speaking on behalf of Focus on the Family, Melissa Fryrear said “the advertising company had turned down the business, but as of Monday, its lawyers had not received an explanation for the decision.” Clear Channel is a publicly traded company, and while they do own TV and radio stations, the Focus ad request was for billboard space. Billboards do not involve publicly owned airwaves, nevertheless Focus has apparently involved their attorneys in the matter.


For its part, Clear Channel said that “local managers reserve the right to reject advertising copy if it does not meet their community’s standards for appropriateness or the copy is deemed offensive towards any business, group or individual.” Fryrear argued that there is nothing objectionable about a message which gives an alternative to those dissatisfied with “living homosexually.” Apparently Ms. Fryrear does not acknowledge the possibility that saying gays and lesbians are simply “living homosexually” could be objectionable.

Does Focus on the Family support the free speech rights of Clear Channel? Perhaps Clear Channel is simply taking the advice of the American Family Association in their threats to Ford and Walmart, that they should remain “neutral in the cultural battles.” If so, America’s corporations should take note, you’re damned if you do and your damned if you don’t.

Source: cnsnews.com

u-dog
02-19-2007, 01:51 PM
But I don't think this is good news. If clear channel declines the "I questioned Homosexuality" billboards then they can also decline the very effective "Would Jesus Descriminate" billboards that Jesus MCC in Indianapolis put up last year as well as the even MORE edgy ones that they plan to put up this Spring and Summer. I'd rather see the freedom to "Duke it out" in the public arena than have corporations deciding which messages are offensive and which are not.

novaseeker
02-19-2007, 01:53 PM
It's very ironic that a group such as FOF would seek to embrace constitutional rights, isn't it?

However, in this particular case, they don't have much of a legal argument. Billboards are private property and the billboard owner does not have to rent the billboard for a message he doesn't like (just like the New York Times doesn't have to run a full-page ad for the Ku Klux Klan if it doesn't want to). So it's more about legal smoke and mirrors here -- and more likely the perverse pleasure they get in appealing to the constitution when they so often find themselves set squarely against it -- than any real substance.