PDA

View Full Version : Seriously need your opinion


andrewlittle
02-14-2009, 07:21 AM
This is the unpolished version so far of the sermon I will preach on Sunday.

Would you help me by giving me feedback?

The sermon:

She came out … just in time to see her young son playing directly inline of the gray, gaunt man who strode down the center of the well-worn path like a mechanical derelict.
For an instant, her heart quailed.
Then she jumped forward, gripped her son by the arm, snatched him out of harm’s way.
The man went by without turning his head.
As his back moved away from her, she hissed at it, “Go away! Get out of here! You ought to be ashamed.”
Thomas’s stride went on, … but to himself he responded, Ashamed? Ashamed?
His face contorted in a wild grimace.
“Beware!”, he cried out.

And he saw that the people he passed, the people who knew him, whose names and houses and handclasps were known to him –
- he saw that they stepped aside, gave him plenty of room.
Some of them looked as if they were holding their breath. ‘
His inner shouting collapsed.
These people did not need the ancient ritual of warning.
He concentrated on restraining the spasmodic snarl which lurched across his face, and let the tight machinery of his will carry him forward step by step.

Watching the startled, frightened or oblivious faces – there were many oblivious faces, though the town was small – that passed around him, he wished he could be sure that his face bore a proper expression of disdain.
Now, as women who had at one time chosen to flirt recoiled from him as if he were some minor horror or ghoul, he felt a sudden treacherous pang of loss.
His nearest neighbors, about a half mile away in either direction, had complained shrilly about his presence among them;
… and, when he refused to sell his property, they moved away from him.

This is not the account of a leper some two thousand years ago.
This is Thomas Covenant – a fictional character based on the very real experiences of rejection of real people.
Thomas is the lead character in Stephen R. Donaldson’s series, The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, and he is a twentieth century leper.
Stephen Donaldson’s father had worked with lepers when he was young, and this was a re-telling of what he witnessed.
When I read the series many years ago I remember thinking, “People don’t react that way anymore. The world is not that archaic.”
But, perhaps it is.
As a culture, have we learned nothing from the Bible lessons about outcasts?


Let us now return to the Biblical stories – two, in particular, that contrast in a very telling way.
In the first story, Elisha responded in a very appropriate way – appropriate for his culture, anyway.
Elisha did not come out to see the leper, but sent a messenger to tell Naaman how he could be healed.
Elisha did not meet Naaman until afterwards – when his skin was as fresh as a child’s and he was disease free.

Contrast that with the way in which Jesus responded when the leper said faithfully, “If you choose, you can make me clean.”
Jesus, being moved – moved, it says – reached out a hand and touched the leper and said, “I do choose. Be made clean.”
Jesus – intimate and tangible – touching the thoroughly unclean.
Now, admittedly, Jesus may have had an immune system that was just wonderful – you might even say, divine.
But Jesus was fully human, though – capable of pain and death as we obviously know already.
Jesus was also capable of tiredness – the need for rest is what usually sent Jesus to Bethany to visit with Mary and Martha, who ministered to Jesus.
So, if Jesus was fully human, Jesus ran an extremely high risk in touching the man with leprosy – except for the plague, it was the most contagious disease in that time and place.
Jesus healed in the name of God, but it nonetheless took faith on the part of Jesus to touch in the name of ministry – to touch the untouchable.
Risky business this ministry of Jesus – dangerous stuff.
And later, when Jesus teaches the disciples to heal, touch will be part of the risk they take, too.

Then, of course, we have Paul giving instruction in ministry.
On the surface of it, there’s not much to tie these together.
On the surface of it.
If we dig a little deeper, we find the common ground.
Now, I’ve got to tell you that I am not a major sports fan, which some already know.
Just about the last thing you’ll hear from me, unless I can’t think of another way to put something, is a sports analogy.
But we have just that.

There are some very basic truths in the 1 Corinthians passage, that line up with the gospel reading.
First, let’s consider the leper in Mark.
The man says to Jesus, “if you choose, I will be made well.”
That is a profound statement of faith, which Jesus acknowledges by being so moved.
Jesus isn’t any more moved by the person’s leprosy that by all the other conditions of sickness, possession and oppression already encountered.
That does move Jesus, because Jesus heals, but it does not cause an emotional expression to the extent that it gets mentioned.
What moves Jesus is this person’s faith.
If you choose, it will be done.
Clear and simple.

That kind of faith is what is being discussed in Paul’s writing.
The kind of faith demonstrated by someone who enters a race in the first place.
When, in a race, only one will win, who trains and prepares and conditions themselves if they do not have some hope of winning.
They may be satisfied with second or third place, or even just finishing the race, but there is that hope of possibly winning that drives the desire to engage in the process in the first place.
Paul is saying, “keep your eyes on the prize.”
Don’t run aimlessly, but condition ourselves to accomplish that which is hoped for.
It doesn’t matter, ultimately, whether or not the first place ribbon is attained, because in striving for the goal faithfulness is evident.

So, what about our race - this event into which we entered?
Did we enter with no expectation of winning?
What were your expectations before we began?
Someone on the pastor nominating committee, right up front in the first interview, said they were pessimistic about the possibilities.
Pessimism has a way of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If we expect to lose, then the likelihood is that we will lose – even if we take the prize, it will be considered a loss.
It will not be enough.
The expectation was to lose, and that becomes inseparable from the goal.

Paul is talking about preparation and persistence.
When you do that, all the little obstacles in the way become annoyances, not roadblocks.
They are things to be worked around, not the cause for turning back.
I annoy some of you.
To others, I am a leper – soiled goods.
Okay, I can accept that.
Is that so important that you are willing to give up on the race?
We entered what was anticipated to be a five year race.
Conditions over which we have no control have shortened the race to about three years.
At least, that’s how it looks now.
But, the last decision is that whether or not the race is finished, we will abandon the race after eighteen months – come June, we will make the decision to quit the race.

Some have already decided that June is the end.
Some have already accepted that we have lost.
If that is true, what is so special about June?
Why not make a decision now.

How many people here today thought, in the beginning, that even though we entered a five year race, we would win it in 18 months?
How many people – come on, show of hands – think that this church could become revitalized again by this coming June?
How many people thought this was a fruitless endeavor to begin with – that there was no possibility we could win this race?
Do not show hands on these question – okay – don’t put your hand up.
Just think about your answer.
How many of you are willing to walk away from the race before it’s done?
If so, why wait another eighteen months, twelve months or four months?
Leave the race.
How many are willing to see the race through to the end?
If so, we need to prepare, condition and conduct ourselves as if the race can be won.
We need to minister to this community as Jesus would - in intimate, personal and tangible ways.

I, for one, am not giving up.
If the race is another 4 years, 1 year or 4 months, I am running this race to win.
I will do that right up until the final day.

How about you?
Where are you in this race?

u-dog
02-14-2009, 08:58 AM
Andrew,

I think that most of the pieces of the puzzle are face up on the table here and that you are moving in the right direction.

Here are the problems that I see. You have two metaphors in operation simultaneously. this is not in and of itself a bad thing but metaphors are like horses in a team ... you have to train them to pull together and I don't think youre there yet. You have the Leper and his faith that Jesus can cure him. and you have Paul's race and the Faith that causes people to keep pulling until they reach the finish line. In addition to those metaphors there is a third metaphor in play ... Leperousy as a metaphor for mental illness and Lepers as a metaphor for the mentally ill. More specifically Mark's leper as a metaphor for you. This is a lot to draw into a single sermon. NOT an impossible amount ... just a lot. I think that you are going to need to be a little more explicit and a little more transparent in order to draw all of these things together and leave your congregation with a clear image of themselves and a clear conviction about what they want to do in the face of the reality before them.

Now, to make your job EVEN MORE difficult here is another piece that needs to be turned face up and its place in the puzzle found.

The Leper doesn't know what healing will look like ... he just knows that Jesus can heal him if he chooses. Your congregation (and you) don't know what healing will look like just that Jesus can provide it if he chooses ... AND that he does. What forms of healing might they experience that they are not expecting?

The runners in the race don't actually know where the finish line is or when it is coming up or what it will look like until they reach it. they just know that if they keep running ... God has an amazing finishline prepared for them.

They are uncertain and afraid ... you need to reframe uncertainty as an adventure ... a good thing


Here is another thought that may be helpful. You are not the only leper in that room. As a congregation ... they are lepers too. On the doorstep of institutional death. Can you create an image of a pack of lepers running a race -- led by a leper -- to a finish line that none of them can imagine but which God has prepared for those with the balls to keep running no matter what?

Anyway... thanks for this opportunity ... you have gotten my imagination going on what I'm gonna say tomorrow morning. I am working the difference between Mark's leper and Na'aman the leper. My title is "Makes no difference who you are"

Zerbie
02-14-2009, 11:40 AM
FYI I read all of it and did not follow it - perhaps if I were familiar with Bible stories AND also familiar with the situations at your church I would follow better. But I was lost. I think U-dog's correct that you need to tighten up some of the metaphors in one way or another.

I wasn't clear what the rhetorical questions at the end were asking about.

stevejones
02-14-2009, 05:18 PM
The sermon was ok. I dont know the age group of the congregation but if its for a younger crowd then it wouldnt be a great one but for a older crowd maybe it would be better liked. Of course make sure you give out your scripture to the church. Other then that I thought it was good. I have been preaching since I was 16 and I am almost 18 and I stopped for a while because I thought I was in the wrong with my feelings towards guys which led me to all the other things i have done. but i see now that there is nothing wrong with me so I am ready to return to the pulpit because I miss preaching more then anything. I have alot of growing to do but I love the way God has used me in the past so He has a purpose for me even if I am gay

BrianB
02-14-2009, 06:50 PM
The metaphor of running the good race seems to be your main idea. I would concentrate on that point. The congregation may get confused if you bring in a lot of the leper idea in the same sermon. I know in your mind they are strongly linked. Perhaps you could make this a two-part sermon; emphasizing one metaphor the first Sunday. Then you could emphasize the second metaphor the next Sunday. That would give your congregation a chance to digest what you have said. You could tie everything together at the end of the second sermon. JMHO

BenL
02-14-2009, 08:56 PM
Andy,

I think U-dog and Brian bring up some, shall we say, obstacles, not roadblocks for your sermon. Too many metaphors or images may tend to muddy the message. I think you need to focus on the curing of the leper or running the race, not both.

The leprosy thing sounds at first much more related to your congregation's seemingly impossible situation. Not so much that they're unclean or outcasts, but that they're asking for the impossible. Four months? Are you kidding? Even five years is a short time to reverse what must have been decades of decline. Could there be an element of testing God here? See, we knew he couldn't do it. Might you and they be more likely to get an inkling of the possiblities in so short a span, rather than a full-blown revitalization? And doesn't the inkling come from within as the beginning of hope for things unseen?

And unlike the leper whose faith amazes Jesus, your text tells me that the congregants are more about unbelief. Given the world's standards, there isn't a prayer of turning this situation around, is there? But given God's power in God's time ... do we dare to believe?

I think you need an opt-in on the part of enough people in the congregation before you can sign them up to run the race Paul is talking about. And how did five years get telescoped into four months? Because of the economy and the shrinking of the endowment? Well, many of them must have IRAs or other savings or investments that have taken a hit? Will they stop living because their net worth has plunged? Or is it that they're looking for a chance to stop giving?

Faith in a project like theirs requires a leap, just as faith in God does. The leper certainly took a leap when he challenged Jesus. But the athlete's training for the race sort of implies that he or she has a chance to win. They sound to me as if they've already given up. I think the impossible dream route is more germane than the fight the good fight schtick.

Well, none of this is meant to trash your sermon, which is full of faith and challenge. I only meant to help unpack some of the present reality a bit. In any case, it's probably too late for Sunday morning's sermon. Good luck.

andrewlittle
02-14-2009, 10:57 PM
U-dog, Brian and Ben, I took none of this to be trashing the sermon at all. If I felt good about it, I wouldn't have asked. There's things that need to be said, though, and precious little time to say them.

I am taking from this that one metaphor is enough - beyond that it needs to be straight talk. Forget the cute - go for understanding.

Zerbie, I should have included either the readings themselves, or at least links to the readings. They are lectionary readings, which is why some others knew what they are. I didn't think baout you or someone else unfamiliar with the Bible readings looking at this. Sorry.

Steve, thanks for the younger view - but you are polar opposite to my congregation. They're getting on - to be polite. We always read the lessons before the sermon, and they are printed in the bulletin, as well.

I will be running the tightening up in my head in the morning, since I won't be using the manuscript. To all, I do appreciate your taking the time to give me feedback.

andrewlittle
02-15-2009, 07:06 AM
... this will be the message this morning.

Readings 1 Kings 5:1-17 (http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=2+Kings+5:1-17&vnum=yes&version=nrsv), 1 Corinthians 9:24-27 (http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=1+Corinthians+9:24-27&vnum=yes&version=nrsv) and Mark 1:40-45 (http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Mark+1:40-45&vnum=yes&version=nrsvae).

The underlying situation (reason for sermon): The church committed to a 5 year effort to revitalize and called me to lead the effort. I am a different kind of pastor for a different kind of situation, but some are ticked that I don't do things the same way that got them in decline in the first place. I have also told them I am Bipolar, which some are using to say I cannot be a minister. Bottomline - the "decision makers" have changed their minds.

The sermon (approximately as delivered):

“She came out … just in time to see her young son playing in the path of the gray, gaunt man who strode down the center of the well-worn road like a mechanical derelict.
“For an instant, her heart quailed.
“Then she jumped forward, gripped her son by the arm, snatched him out of harm’s way.
“The man went by without turning his head.
“As his back moved away from her, she hissed at it, “Go away! Get out of here! You ought to be ashamed.”
“Thomas’s stride went on, … but to himself he responded, Ashamed? Ashamed?”

“He saw that the people he passed, the people who knew him, whose names and houses and handclasps were known to him –
- he saw that they stepped aside, gave him plenty of room.
“Some of them looked as if they were holding their breath. ‘
“Women, who had at one time chosen to flirt, recoiled from him as if he were some minor horror or ghoul, and he felt a sudden treacherous pang of loss.
“His inner being collapsed, as it did every day.”

This is an account in the day of the life of a leper.
Thomas is the lead character in Stephen R. Donaldson’s series, The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, and he is a fictional twentieth century leper – albeit one based on a real person’s experiences.
When I read the series many years ago I remember thinking, “People don’t react that way anymore. The world is not that archaic.”
But, perhaps it is.

Two of our passages contrast in a very telling way.
In the first story, Elisha responded in a very appropriate way to the advance of a leper – appropriate for his culture, anyway.
Elisha did not come out to see the leper, but sent a messenger to tell Naaman how he could be healed.
Elisha did not meet Naaman until afterwards – when his skin was as fresh as a child’s and he was disease free.
When it was safe.

Contrast that with the way in which Jesus responded when the leper said faithfully, “If you choose, you can make me clean.”
Jesus, being moved – moved, it says – reached out a hand and touched the leper and said, “I do choose. Be made clean.”
Jesus – intimate and tangible – touching the thoroughly unclean.
Jesus was divine, but fully human, too – capable of pain and death as we obviously know already.
Jesus was also capable of tiredness – the need for rest is what usually sent Jesus to Bethany to visit with Mary and Martha, who ministered to Jesus.
So, since Jesus was fully human, Jesus ran an extremely high risk in touching the man with leprosy – it was the most contagious disease in that time and place.
Jesus not only could have contracted leprosy, but also passed it on to anyone else Jesus touched.
Jesus healed in the name of God, but it nonetheless took faith on the part of Jesus to touch in the name of ministry – to touch the untouchable.
Risky business this ministry of Jesus – dangerous stuff.
And later, when Jesus teaches the disciples to heal, touch will be part of the risk they take, too.

Then, of course, we have out third reading – one in which Paul gives instruction in ministry.
On the surface of it, there’s not much to tie these readings together.
On the surface of it.
If we dig a little deeper, we find the common ground.

First, let’s consider the leper in Mark.
The man says to Jesus, “if you choose, I will be made well.”
That is a profound statement of faith, which Jesus acknowledges by being moved.
What moves Jesus?
It isn’t that the leper is pathetic, or horribly deformed, or pleading for health.
What moves Jesus is this person’s faith.
“If you choose, it will be done,” the leper says.
Clear and simple, the leper has faith that Jesus will heal – that wellness will prevail – and Jesus is emotionally moved by this.

Exactly that kind of faith is being discussed in I Corinthians.
Paul is talking about preparation and persistence, and sticking to a goal as if we fully intend that goal be accomplished.
Can we examine the leper, and ultimately ourselves, through the lens of 1 Corinthians?
The outcast – the leper – approached Jesus to be healed, knowing that if Jesus chose to do so, he would be made well.
What kind of healing did the leper anticipate, though?
Did the leper know what wellness would look like?
Sometimes healing looks like a dignified death with the person being spiritually healed.
Sometimes, it looks like a disease going into remission.
Jesus could have stopped the leprosy from doing any more damage.
But this person’s body would still show scars, missing fingers and toes, and even a contorted face that would still make people back away.
This person would still look unclean – for all intents and purposes, he might as well still have leprosy.
Sometimes healing looks like not just remission, but a complete physical restoration of health.
Jesus could heal the leprosy completely, and send the man on his way looking healthy – at least physically - on the surface.
What of the internal scars? The scars of being rejected, despised and outcast because of something this person had no control over.
Left untreated, these emotional scars would prove to be almost as debilitating as the physical illness.
What we hope for is full resurrection from the illness - and what the leper hoped for was that Jesus would heal the whole person - body, mind and soul.
We hope that when this leper is made clean – the resultant health and vitality went deep to all parts of his being.

When we decided that we were going to run the risk of seeking revitalization, what kind of wholeness did we anticipate?
Was it to prepare for a dignified and jubilant end to the life of this church?
Was it simply a stop to the decline that has been occurring all these years? A quick fix?
Did we hope for that AND a cosmetic make-over – maybe just add some numbers in the pews to give the impression of health and vitality?
Or, did we want the full body, mind and soul healing that only faith in God can provide.
Did we want the church to be changed and enlivened to its core?
There is no shame in any of the choices, but faithfulness leads us to hope for either the first or the last.
Now, consider that when this leper approached Jesus, there were roadblocks.
A person with leprosy, in that time, would expect to be rejected – to be pushed away if they dared approach a clean person, never mind a holy person.
The fact that this person dared to approach means that the first obstacles were already overcome – the fear and expectation of failure.

The fear of failure is powerful.
If the leper was afraid of failure, Jesus would never have laid eyes on him.
Fear would have prevented any consideration of looking for new vitality and health, any possibility of even daring to dream of wellness.
Fear would have said, “Look! You’ll be rejected and fail, and if that happens you will feel worse than you do now.”
Don’t risk disappointment. Just don’t try in the first place.
I’m going to guess that we also overcame that fear of failure.

The expectation of failure can be even more powerful, but in more subtle ways.
Within weeks of my coming here, you probably heard that some folks were pessimistic about any possibility of our revitalizing the church.
The truth is that if we expect to lose, the likelihood is that we will lose.
Even positive results will not be enough.
Any signs of recovery – subtle or profound – will not be recognized as signs.
The expectation to lose becomes inseparable from the goal, and not failing becomes in some way unacceptable.
Can we see the Reign is upon us, but not yet realized?

Paul is talking about preparation and persistence in striving for faithful hope.
When we do that, all the obstacles in the way become mere annoyances, not roadblocks.
They are things to be worked through, not the cause for turning back.
It could be a lot of things.
Maybe it’s because others would do things differently.
Maybe, it’s because others think we should do things better.
Maybe, it’s because we think we will attract the wrong kind of people.
Then again, maybe it’s because we’re not as healthy as others think we should be.
But, no matter the reason, we can accept that we view weakness more clearly than faith in God’s compassion and loving kindness.
That’s okay.
We share in the lifelong process of being healed.
Are we willing to give up on the race we started?

There’s a lot of beauty and faith remaining in this church, this part of the Body of Christ.
In faith, we undertook a journey.
When we keep putting one foot in front of the other – when we keep striving – that is being faithful.

What kind of healing do we hope for?
What kind of healing will Christ provide?
If healing comes, will it not come to all of us – as long as we trust in God and recognize each other as worthy of Christ’s healing?
If we call it quits too early, will we experience the healing that Christ has in store for us?
We accept the risk – we have to – no matter whether the resurrection looks like a healthy death or a healthy life.

BrianB
02-15-2009, 07:35 AM
Your sermon is very good! The transition between metaphors flows much more smoothly. That was the main thing that bothered me. It was difficult to follow why the metaphors related to each other in your first post. You certainly have thrown down the gauntlet to the congregation. Hopefully, they will accept the challenge instead of quitting.

andrewlittle
02-15-2009, 07:43 AM
Your sermon is very good! The transition between metaphors flows much more smoothly. That was the main thing that bothered me. It was difficult to follow why the metaphors related to each other in your first post. You certainly have thrown down the gauntlet to the congregation. Hopefully, they will accept the challenge instead of quitting.

Thanks, Brian. Say some prayers for us in the next week or so, will you?

u-dog
02-15-2009, 12:53 PM
How did it preach? any threats of tar and feathers? anyone get up and leave?

andrewlittle
02-15-2009, 02:22 PM
How did it preach? any threats of tar and feathers? anyone get up and leave?

No to all the above.

Two members of COM made a surprise visit to service - they got as much of a piece of my mind as I could spare after the service.

They noticed, however, that none of the "cadre of four", those who hold the seat of power in the church, were present. They evidently asked another elder if that was common. She told them, "No! They take turns coming so they're only there once a month each." Cheeky elder. :)

They also asked me if people tend to always stay around and talk about the sermon. I was honest and said, "Occasionally, but it's not that common."

There were also three new people in service, each of whom were quite vocal afterwards and two of whom want to meet during the week to come. Tow, who weren't together, mentioned they felt warmed by the mention of dignity in the sermon. And a reasonably regular visitor responded positively to an invitation to join.

That may all seem a little like non-events, but when you're talking a church of 21 members, anything is significant.

Anyway, I think I saw God's hand in replacing the four who are rarely present with four who are not members, but were very present.

All told, I think the COM got a little different view than they were anticipating.

u-dog
02-15-2009, 03:13 PM
There IS a God after all ... hmmmmm ... whoda thunk? Glad you had a Good day my brother !!

Daniel
02-19-2009, 06:30 PM
The 'no accidents' thought Andy. 4 for 4? A very intersting thing, this thing called life. All sorts of unusual things can happen. And it sounds like you had a interesting morning. Everyone got more than they bargained for. More information. More speaking up. More truth.

Your church is damn lucky (blessed!) to have you!