View Single Post
  #10  
Old 01-19-2006, 09:35 AM
Emproph's Avatar
Emproph Emproph is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 1,856
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legion
In this remarkable bit of literature you have attacked the doctrine of biblical innerrancy using a passage of Scripture, which is logically inconsistent and self-defeating.
Precisely my point, “A passage of Scripture” that directly implies the possibility of error is “logically inconsistent” with the claim of Biblical inerrancy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legion
I would say you are missing at least one somethings, if not several.
Which is why I asked, to show I wasn’t just assuming I couldn’t be wrong.
-So I re-ask, what specifically is it that I’m missing?

-I'm not questioning "remarkable literature," I'm questioning what I perceive to be the absence of very unremarkable logic.
Reply With Quote