I agree, and while I'm certainly disappointed...
I wonder if it's better that it go the Supreme Court route. The pragmatic part of me says that it doesn't matter how it happens, just that it happens. But the seldom-seen idealist sliver of Matt thinks that he'd rather have it declared that gay rights have always been a part of the Constitution than have a law written based on the notion that gay rights aren't there by nature.
Does that make any sense?