From rollingstone.com June 1, 2006
I've been reading this article on yuricarereport.com (more goodies on that site too). They made all the footnotes links so itís easier to investigate as youíre reading it and get a better credibility factor feel for it.
Thereís a lot of information here, article-wise and 208 footnotes. It's worth a skim at least, maybe we can revive this thread come fall.
I know many of us assume or at least suspect this to be the case, but it's the first detailed analysis that seems to give a good overview of all the variables involved.
Iíve only followed a few links so far, but for all the numbers and breakdown involved itís pretty interesting.
-I would be remiss if I didn't complicate things further:
Refuted by Salon.com
Yuricareport refutation of refutation
Brings back memories of Ď04... Good times...
P.S. Weíre screwed.
More related info - Rolling Stone.