From rollingstone.com June 1, 2006
I've been reading this article on yuricarereport.com (more goodies on that site too). They made all the footnotes links so it’s easier to investigate as you’re reading it and get a better credibility factor feel for it.
There’s a lot of information here, article-wise and 208 footnotes. It's worth a skim at least, maybe we can revive this thread come fall.
I know many of us assume or at least suspect this to be the case, but it's the first detailed analysis that seems to give a good overview of all the variables involved.
I’ve only followed a few links so far, but for all the numbers and breakdown involved it’s pretty interesting.
-I would be remiss if I didn't complicate things further:
Refuted by Salon.com
Yuricareport refutation of refutation
Brings back memories of ‘04... Good times...
P.S. We’re screwed.
More related info - Rolling Stone.