Home > Forums

Go Back   Soulforce Community Forums > Community Center > GLBT News/Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2006, 04:23 PM
dewdrop_world's Avatar
dewdrop_world dewdrop_world is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NoVA, USA
Posts: 293
Default Online discussion at washingtonpost.com re: gay issues & 3 denominations

Worth a quick read. The questions are (mostly) well thought out.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...111501241.html

James
__________________
dewdrop_world
music for dancing · thinking · breathing · love · life
http://www.dewdrop-world.net
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2006, 05:46 PM
Daniel's Avatar
Daniel Daniel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,591
Default Give me a T

Interesting article James. Thank you.

Being a musician, this comment stood out.

Quote:
Arlington, Va.: On the gays in church leadership positions, I am reminded of Eugene Robinson's comment of a few weeks ago, "Ministers, look toward your choir masters."

Alan Cooperman: Yes, my friend and fellow reporter here, Daryl Fears, who covers race for the Post, wrote a marvelous story in 2004 about gays in black churches, making much the same point about the frequent disconnect between pulpits and choirs, and how uncomfortable the secrecy is for many churchgoers and leaders.
And as someone who practices (Buddhist) meditation:

Quote:
Washington, D.C.: As a Presbyterian, I, of course, am following this story. I did read that the charges against the minister were dropped and the stated reason was that the statute of limitations had expired. I strongly suspect that the presbytery wanted to avoid ruling on the matter. I think it is only a matter of time before the official Presbyterian policy will be to allow each congregation to decide whether to ordain homosexuals and whether to allow them to marry in the church. I am personally okay with a solution like this and truthfully find it more questionable under church law that the minister married a Presbyterian to a practicing Buddhist.
Whom, I wonder, does 'Washington D.C.' think he is kidding? He really thinks that being of a different faith is a far more serious matter than gay marriage? It really must be a club that is hard to get into!

But I like where the author ended up.

Quote:
Arlington, Va.: Do these Christian denominations risk marginalizing themselves in the future, when homosexuality is almost certain to become much more acceptable to the straight world than it is today (look at attitudes of the younger generation from survey data)?


Alan Cooperman
: If current trends in public acceptance of homosexuality continue with no change or plateau, you will be right. But, social history has seldom followed a straight line. Moreover, two of the people that I quoted in the article said, in essence, that the church is proclaiming "the truth." Perhaps that should be spelled with a capital T. If you are certain you are proclaiming the Truth, then the popularity of your message is a very secondary matter.
The politics of separation and exclusion no longer work. Give me a T with no caps!
__________________
Be the love you seek.

Last edited by Daniel; 11-16-2006 at 10:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.


The views expressed in the Soulforce Community Forums are the views of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Soulforce.
©Copyright 2008 Soulforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Web Development by Curious Find.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.