Dobson on the ENDA

[ladyinred]

ENDA
Proposed bill would be bad for business
Print this page Forward to a friend
October 25, 2007

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. –President Bush will abide by his senior advisors’ counsel and veto ENDA should the proposed bill land on his desk. This move, commended by Focus on the Family, would help steer businesses away from costly unnecessary lawsuits.

Businesses are already prohibited from hiring, firing or making employment decisions based a person’s race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age or disability. With ENDA, Congress would add yet another category to this class: “actual or perceived sexual orientation.” Sexual orientation includes homosexuality, heterosexuality or “bisexuality.”

By creating a special federal protection for people’s “actual or perceived” sexual orientation, ENDA would create conflicting rights in the workplace. Employers are already required to protect their employees’ religious freedom in the workplace, and many religious faiths oppose the practice or endorsement of homosexuality. Thus, protecting religious freedom and “actual or perceived sexual orientation” makes for inevitable workplace litigation.

Not only would ENDA open the door for more litigation, but it may violate a business owners’ freedom of conscience. If a proprietor adheres to certain religious beliefs, ENDA would ban him from making employment decisions based on those cherished principles.

To access the official statement issued by the Executive of the President, please visit http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/legisl...r3685sap-r.pdf.

[Alecto]

Ooooo....scare quotes around bisexuality.

I don't see why these arguments still work on people. If it's my religious belief that God put different races on different continents because blah blah blah racist rhetoric blah, guess what? That religious belief needs to stay in your personal life: in your professional life, you need to be (here's a shocker): professional.