Thanks, Huck!

[keltic63]

from the interview at Beliefnet:

Originally Posted by Huckabee

Well, I don’t think that’s a radical view to say we’re going to affirm marriage. I think the radical view is to say that we’re going to change the definition of marriage so that it can mean two men, two women, a man and three women, a man and a child, a man and animal. Again, once we change the definition, the door is open to change it again. I think the radical position is to make a change in what’s been historic.

did you leave any of the stereotypes out of this one? polygamy, pedophilia, and bestiality; nope, looks like you've got all the bases covered