Home > Forums

Go Back   Soulforce Community Forums > Community Center > National and World News/Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-03-2007, 08:13 AM
Daniel's Avatar
Daniel Daniel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,591
Default aside

Nova- thank you for the clarification. I get it now.
__________________
Be the love you seek.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-03-2007, 12:24 PM
kara speltz's Avatar
kara speltz kara speltz is offline
Soulforce Staff
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oakland, Ca
Posts: 752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdogg View Post
I dunno, just a thought, but perhaps the common Christian belief of "original sin" is partly why some folk destroy their precious little children? To save them from hell??? It's just so bizzare to me, and although it's something that's been hammered into my head (and out my ears thank goodness) by so-called Christian folk my whole life, but still hard to grasp and BIZARRE.
I think there's another aspect to this that's not being considered and that is the theology that the vast majority of Christians espouse saying that the only possible way to atone for all of our sins was for God to sacrifice His son. Even though I'm Catholic, I have a great deal of problems with this conception of God. Now I know that's going to freak out a lot of other christians, but I truly believe that we've got that theology wrong.

I don't fully understand the why's and the hows of Jesus life, except that He came to teach us about love. But I can't comprehend a God that would sacrifice his son. I just give thanks for the life of Jesus because it is a constant reminder to me that we are all called to unconditional love. I also don't believe that we can, in this life, comprehend God, so I'm willing to live with the lack of understanding.

Kara
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-04-2007, 01:27 PM
Tinkerbell047 Tinkerbell047 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 77
Default

I don't remember where I heard this, but I remember last year, I believe, the Federal Government gave Alaska 2.7 (I think) BILLION (yes, with a B) dollars to build a bridge. Okay, so bridge building is a good thing, but here's the kicker: Said bridge would connect from mainland Alaska to a little island of 37 people. Okay, those 37 people have been using a ferry to get to their island and get back home for however many years, but the Feds decided that we could spend billions of dollars to make their lives more convenient... Oh, and I think I heard somewhere that the bridge would only cost a portion of that money. My question now is this: What did they do with the rest of the cash?

-Tink
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 PM.


The views expressed in the Soulforce Community Forums are the views of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Soulforce.
©Copyright 2008 Soulforce, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Web Development by Curious Find.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.